<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India vs China &#8211; A Bird&#8217;s Eye View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/</link>
	<description>Utkarsh&#039;s thoughts on India, Web 2.0, Linux and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:02:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Post on What India Needs to Overtake China &#171; Understanding China, One Blog at a Time</title>
		<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Post on What India Needs to Overtake China &#171; Understanding China, One Blog at a Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utkarshsengar.com/?p=126#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] article here: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utkarsh</title>
		<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Utkarsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utkarshsengar.com/?p=126#comment-107</guid>
		<description>India is definitely a &quot;power&quot;, but an untapped power. As I said, &quot;it&#039;s an elephant&quot;, so, I am waiting for my elephant to take longer and bolder strides forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India is definitely a &#8220;power&#8221;, but an untapped power. As I said, &#8220;it&#8217;s an elephant&#8221;, so, I am waiting for my elephant to take longer and bolder strides forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utkarshsengar.com/?p=126#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Beijing most significantly counted on massive credit growth to spur the economy. The amount of new loans made in 2009 nearly doubled from the year before to $1.4 trillion – representing almost 30% of GDP. The stimulus plan worked wonders, holding up growth even as China&#039;s exports dropped 16% in 2009.
But now China is facing the consequences of its largesse. Fears are rising that Beijing&#039;s easy-money policies have fueled a potential property-price bubble. According to government data, average real estate prices in Chinese cities jumped 7.8% in December from a year earlier — the fastest increase in 18 months. The credit boom has also sparked worries about the nation&#039;s banking system. Many economists expect the large surge in credit to lead to a growing number of nonperforming loans (NPLs). In a November report, UBS economist Wang Tao calculates that if 20% of all new lending in 2009 and 10% of the amount in 2010 goes bad over the next three to five years, the total amount of NPLs from China&#039;s stimulus program would reach $400 billion, or roughly 8% of GDP.
India, meanwhile, isn&#039;t experiencing nearly the same degree of fallout from its recession-fighting methods. The government used the same tools as every other to support growth when the financial crisis hit – cutting interest rates, offering tax breaks and increasing fiscal spending – but the scale was smaller than in China. Goldman Sachs estimates that India&#039;s government stimulus will total $36 billion this fiscal year, or only 3% of GDP. By comparison, China&#039;s two-year, $585 billion package is roughly twice as large, at about 6% of GDP per year. Most important, India managed to achieve its substantial growth without putting its banking sector at risk. In fact, India&#039;s banks have remained quite conservative through the downturn, especially compared with Chinese lenders. 

I think this should probably give u little hopes about india&#039;s future...yes china has an edge in certain sectors..but u cant deny india&#039;s strength like pharmaceuticals etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beijing most significantly counted on massive credit growth to spur the economy. The amount of new loans made in 2009 nearly doubled from the year before to $1.4 trillion – representing almost 30% of GDP. The stimulus plan worked wonders, holding up growth even as China&#8217;s exports dropped 16% in 2009.<br />
But now China is facing the consequences of its largesse. Fears are rising that Beijing&#8217;s easy-money policies have fueled a potential property-price bubble. According to government data, average real estate prices in Chinese cities jumped 7.8% in December from a year earlier — the fastest increase in 18 months. The credit boom has also sparked worries about the nation&#8217;s banking system. Many economists expect the large surge in credit to lead to a growing number of nonperforming loans (NPLs). In a November report, UBS economist Wang Tao calculates that if 20% of all new lending in 2009 and 10% of the amount in 2010 goes bad over the next three to five years, the total amount of NPLs from China&#8217;s stimulus program would reach $400 billion, or roughly 8% of GDP.<br />
India, meanwhile, isn&#8217;t experiencing nearly the same degree of fallout from its recession-fighting methods. The government used the same tools as every other to support growth when the financial crisis hit – cutting interest rates, offering tax breaks and increasing fiscal spending – but the scale was smaller than in China. Goldman Sachs estimates that India&#8217;s government stimulus will total $36 billion this fiscal year, or only 3% of GDP. By comparison, China&#8217;s two-year, $585 billion package is roughly twice as large, at about 6% of GDP per year. Most important, India managed to achieve its substantial growth without putting its banking sector at risk. In fact, India&#8217;s banks have remained quite conservative through the downturn, especially compared with Chinese lenders. </p>
<p>I think this should probably give u little hopes about india&#8217;s future&#8230;yes china has an edge in certain sectors..but u cant deny india&#8217;s strength like pharmaceuticals etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India vs China – A Bird’s Eye View &#171; MarketingTypo.com</title>
		<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>India vs China – A Bird’s Eye View &#171; MarketingTypo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utkarshsengar.com/?p=126#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] full post on the lost logbook    @import [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] full post on the lost logbook    @import [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utkarsh Sengar</title>
		<link>http://utkarshsengar.com/2010/01/india-vs-china-birds-eye-view/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Utkarsh Sengar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utkarshsengar.com/?p=126#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;India vs China - A Bird&#039;s Eye View http://bit.ly/4wd8yu&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">India vs China &#8211; A Bird&#39;s Eye View <a href="http://bit.ly/4wd8yu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4wd8yu</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
